MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191107
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 10:41
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 224
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 356
47% 355 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 22
13% 17.8 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 17.9
Splatting 14.2
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 142 92 82 94 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 482
Write 428
Mixed 155
SusWrite 137
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 33.7
124% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 128
123% 198 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
196GB free
Firmware: FBEOC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 35
Write 37.7
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 33.2
24% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata CT8G4DFS8266.C8FN 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 33
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 28.7
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1280 720 HWP3220 HP 24uh
Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback