Positivo VJFE55F11X-B0211H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemPositivo VJFE55F11X-B0211H  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-TGLBAT55
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 21:39
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 62.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 227
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 408
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 20.6
13% 17.6 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 15.6
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C970 M.2 2280 NVMe 512GB SSD
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DHT1E8P2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 622 686 646 644 803 798 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
143% Outstanding
Read 1,255
Write 1,017
Mixed 962
SusWrite 700
220% 984 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 36.1
143% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 136
104% 138 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 143%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HEMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0812
Typical VJFE55F11X-B0211H Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE55F11X-B0211H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback