Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 20:00
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 66
2-Core 128
57% 92.6 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 323
34% 270 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 54.2
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 51
44% 53.6 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 49.8
Splatting 45.4
42% 52.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 252 197 193 190 205 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 447
Mixed 296
SusWrite 203
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 46.5
154% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 258
190% 247 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91%
Great: 114%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
418GB free
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 302 320 324 326 325 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 487
Write 416
Mixed 414
SusWrite 295
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 34.1
130% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 146
135% 207 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 102%
Corsair Neutron NX500 NVMe PCIe 800GB-$637
601GB free
Firmware: E7FM04.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 468 555 577 580 574 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 822
Write 809
Mixed 707
SusWrite 504
160% 710 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 40.9
136% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 477
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 445
330% 436 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 233%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
96GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 87 57 57 58 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 469
Write 376
Mixed 319
SusWrite 81.1
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 33.2
116% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 105
116% 196 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 15 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback