TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-14D2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive148% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 B11SB
MotherboardMSI MS-14D2  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 15:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 131
2-Core 233
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 542
58% 462 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 71.3%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX450
MSI(1462 12E0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 41.7
34% 35.3 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 45.5
Splatting 34.3
27% 32.6 fps
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 31.8%
 Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 779 834 825 791 628 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,082
Write 824
Mixed 744
SusWrite 654
185% 826 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 39
146% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 605
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 284
256% 396 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑
This bench: 148%
 Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 12.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 42.1%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 14" 1280 720 BOE08D7
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-14D2 Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14D2

CPU
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples99x
Gen Intel Core i5-1155G711thBench 66%, 4,814 samples37x
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples34x
GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples157x
GeForce MX450NvidiaBench 29%, 1,913 samples31x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples9x
SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GBKingstonBench 135%, 20,980 samples93x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples57x
OM8PCP31024F-AI1 1TBKingstonBench 179%, 2,896 samples12x
RAM
M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 7,175 samples59x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples28x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 45%, 34,565 samples27x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback