Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X415EA
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 15:06
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 59.3
1-Core 136
2-Core 246
78% 147 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 546
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 526
32% 526 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 17D2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4369
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.64% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 19.7
0% 10.2 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 0.64%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL HBRPEKNX0101A 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 146 27 45 15 6.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 597
Write 400
Mixed 418
SusWrite 47.7
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 45.8
162% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 211
159% 210 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 143%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
506GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 87 89 88 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 77.5
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 87.5
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 7.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 10 82 60 60 14" 1296 759 BOE07F7
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X415EA_V4200EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback