Asus G73Jh

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

System	Asus G73Jh (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110127
Uptime	15.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 28 '23 at 14:33
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 51.6 2-Core 89.1 52% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 218 26% 198 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870 3,040 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.65% Terrible	Lighting 11.6 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 10.6 10% 11 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 7.8 7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.65% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 227 229 238 221 216 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.9% Above average	Read 239 Write 217 Mixed 223 SusWrite 224 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 27.4 92% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 177 133% 177 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 4TB-$846 723 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 2TB free Firmware: RVM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 227 229 239 221 216 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.2% Above average	Read 235 Write 207 Mixed 216 SusWrite 224 50% 221 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 29.2 89% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 183 137% 182 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.3% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 12.9 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 10.5 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	61	43	60	17.2"	1600 847	AUO139E

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	64x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	24x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	5x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5870AMDBench 9%, 3,040 samples	96x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
Mobility Radeon HD 5800 Series (CRT Emudriver)AMDBench 9%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
Mercury Electra 6G SSD 240GBOWCBench 67%, 154 samples	5x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	2x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	2x

RAM
ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 4x2GBKingstonBench 39%, 402 samples	16x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	6x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 455 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16