Asus G73Jh

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus G73Jh (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Jh
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110127
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 07:54
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190 13,278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 119 60% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 182 8-Core 232 26% 207 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Mobility Radeon HD 5870 3,040 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1C02) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	8.96% Terrible	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 11.3 Parallax 10.7 10% 11.4 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 9.5 Splatting 7.9 7% 8.93 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.96% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9750423AS 750GB-$74 3,332 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 57 64 63 66 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 84.2 Write 85 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 62.1 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 51%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB 3,317 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 378GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 58 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 73.7 Write 71.5 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 60.2 45% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 62%
Toshiba HDWL120 2TB 1,726 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 967GB free Firmware: JT000A SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 113 113 113 114 114 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 136 Write 126 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 114 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.6 227% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 80CE M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-040.A01LF 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.4% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Jh Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Jh

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	64x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	24x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	5x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 5870AMDBench 9%, 3,040 samples	96x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	1x
Mobility Radeon HD 5800 Series (CRT Emudriver)AMDBench 9%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
Mercury Electra 6G SSD 240GBOWCBench 67%, 154 samples	5x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $40Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	2x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	2x

RAM
ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 4x2GBKingstonBench 39%, 402 samples	16x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3x2GBHynixBench 35%, 234 samples	6x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4x2GBHynixBench 41%, 455 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $220

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16