Acer Nitro AN517-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Karoq_CMS
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '23 at 04:11
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 162
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 382
42% 333 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.3% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 6.6
5% 6.37 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.3%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 762 402 294 284 293 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 786
Write 1230
Mixed 980
SusWrite 387
191% 846 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 44.4
138% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 679
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 540
413% 563 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 124%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 12GB
2400, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE084E
Typical Nitro AN517-52 Builds (Compare 3,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback