Acer Aspire A315-24PT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-24PT  (all builds)
MotherboardMDC Herbag_MDU
Memory7 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 16:33
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 58.7
2-Core 115
45% 76.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 309
32% 258 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1654) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.24.01
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 10.3
2% 7.73 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 6
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00-1114 1TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70659000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 619 640 607 649 649 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 595
Write 609
Mixed 584
SusWrite 627
136% 604 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 26.3
85% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 404
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 387
276% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 104%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D8DR-031 WT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN154C
Typical Aspire A315-24PT Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-24PT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback