Asus GL503VD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus GL503VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL503VD
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 15:53
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 163
50% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 462
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1BB0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3742
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 29
Parallax 29.8
21% 28.1 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 20.1
19% 24 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 11 6.7 25 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 166%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
659GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 90 98 116 105 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
2GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.9 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH HMA81GS6CJR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.8% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 19.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 60 15.5" 1920 1009 LGD046F
Typical GL503VD Builds (Compare 1,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL503VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback