Zoostorm 9872-0082A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 9872-0082A  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-DS2V
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 12:51
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 69.5
1-Core 93.1
2-Core 179
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 445
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2037 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.42
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 65.2
32% 58.3 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 64.2
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingFast 256GB
11GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 390
Mixed 378
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 26.2
116% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 41.3
84% 164 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 139%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 64 65 28 36 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 48.1
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 51.9
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-041.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 20 60 24" 1280 720 GSM58C5 E2442
Typical 9872-0082A Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Zoostorm 9872-0082A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback