MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 491%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 130%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 503%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 135%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics383% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive496% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D91
MotherboardMSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91)  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 12:32
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 232
2-Core 462
137% 263 Pts
4-Core 924
8-Core 1,811
162% 1,368 Pts
64-Core 1820
113% 1820 Pts
Poor: 120%
This bench: 135%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3180 MHz, MLim: 5500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
383% Outstanding
Lighting 615
Reflection 492
Parallax 678
501% 595 fps
MRender 513
Gravity 564
Splatting 294
358% 457 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 383%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3038 1909 1888 1898 1883 1922 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
496% Outstanding
Read 2,964
Write 3,512
Mixed 3199
SusWrite 2,090
664% 2,941 MB/s
4K Read 90.4
4K Write 272
4K Mixed 136
454% 166 MB/s
DQ Read 2644
DQ Write 2,264
DQ Mixed 2,428
1,827% 2,446 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 496%
Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
406GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 489 490 490 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 487
Mixed 467
SusWrite 490
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 65.2
227% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 346
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
303GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 452 447 421 456 444 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 482
Mixed 379
SusWrite 449
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 49.1
194% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 240
208% 309 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$193
297GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2084 1653 1665 1650 1670 1446 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
478% Outstanding
Read 3,851
Write 3,660
Mixed 2,667
SusWrite 1,695
665% 2,968 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 98
343% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 2,798
DQ Write 2,372
DQ Mixed 2,553
1,922% 2,574 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 478%
Great: 564%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 157 158 159 156 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 169
Write 141
Mixed 109
SusWrite 158
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.1
22% 7.47 MB/s
DQ Read 1.2
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 1
2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 39%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 191 191 189 191 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 135
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 187
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hewlett-Packard 48U45AA# 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
157% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 58.3
MC Mixed 55
164% 57.3 GB/s
SC Read 35
SC Write 56.7
SC Mixed 43.8
129% 45.2 GB/s
Latency 50.1
80% 50.1 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 157%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 0P 5R 10G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 40% 45 217 60 60 43.4" 1280 720 TCL0000 50S535
Typical MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91) Builds (Compare 952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 349%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 416%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z790 TOMAHAWK WIFI DDR4(MS-7D91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,397
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback