Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 282%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 288%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics251% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive467% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230619
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 06:56
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$259
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 195
2-Core 391
119% 225 Pts
4-Core 762
8-Core 1,354
128% 1,058 Pts
64-Core 1,789
111% 1,789 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$773
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Lighting 368
Reflection 347
Parallax 375
300% 363 fps
MRender 503
Gravity 305
Splatting 219
266% 343 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 251%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3313 3348 3377 2415 1622 1612 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
467% Outstanding
Read 2,865
Write 3,435
Mixed 3,148
SusWrite 2,614
682% 3,016 MB/s
4K Read 78.8
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 115
384% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,772
DQ Write 1,534
DQ Mixed 1,658
1,241% 1,654 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 467%
Great: 488%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
122GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 464 101 57 210 46 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 439
Mixed 387
SusWrite 225
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 28
157% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 1
74% 171 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 100%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
233GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 480 481 429 419 417 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 460
Mixed 407
SusWrite 450
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 58.9
208% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 291
241% 347 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 129%
Great: 125%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
158GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 463 463 463 462 303 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 454
Mixed 416
SusWrite 436
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 34.4
168% 68.8 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 50.2
105% 209 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 109%
Great: 92%
Amd-raid WDC WD6003FFBX-6 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 229 230 235 226 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 221
Write 225
Mixed 96.2
SusWrite 231
141% 193 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.3
355% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 130%
Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 68.2
MC Write 52.5
MC Mixed 58.9
171% 59.9 GB/s
SC Read 50.8
SC Write 54
SC Mixed 52.9
150% 52.6 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 140%
This bench: 165%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 IVM663D PL2760Q
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $979
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback