Today's hottest deals

MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D78
MotherboardMSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 14:43
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900-$339
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 204
2-Core 353
110% 210 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,025
97% 806 Pts
64-Core 2,709
168% 2,709 Pts
Poor: 98%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.4% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 137
Parallax 124
101% 128 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 129
Splatting 113
96% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 69 73 69 67 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,735
Write 2,028
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 181
224% 1,011 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 7.8
109% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 1,480
792% 724 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 126%
Great: 419%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
411GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 75 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 66.7
Write 65.3
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 75.5
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 85%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
642GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 66 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 67.3
Write 97.7
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 64.6
108% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
140% Outstanding
MC Read 53.4
MC Write 47.2
MC Mixed 48.5
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 48.9
SC Write 57.6
SC Mixed 48.5
148% 51.7 GB/s
Latency 93.8
43% 93.8 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 140%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 9 219 60 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23C4 ASUS VC239
Typical PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78) Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 210%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 220%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B650-P WIFI (MS-7D78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 161% - Outstanding Total price: $811
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback