| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 92.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Maxsun MS-Challenger H610M-D (all builds) |
| Motherboard | MAXSUN MS-Challenger H610M-D |
| Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20230423 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 26 '23 at 04:13 |
| Run Duration | 113 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84%
Excellent
|
94% 178 Pts
|
82% 653 Pts
|
50% 806 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.Q3.1
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
92.7%
Outstanding
|
95% 133 fps
|
88% 110 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 426 431 453 457 456 MB/s
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
74% 331 MB/s
|
142% 52.7 MB/s
|
168% 248 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AX4U36008G18I-BBKD45 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2600 MHz
|
75.2%
Very good
|
77% 27.1 GB/s
|
68% 23.7 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 71 | 59 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | ACI24C7 ASUS VP247 |
Typical MS-Challenger H610M-D Builds (Compare 8 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Maxsun MS-Challenger H610M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-12100FIntel $85Bench 94%, 11,860 samples | 5x |
| Core i5-12400FIntel $110Bench 98%, 48,886 samples | 2x |
| Core i3-12100Intel $112Bench 94%, 2,263 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $277 |