Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T1600
MotherboardDell Precision T1600  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 19:39
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 287
36% 276 Pts
64-Core 282
18% 282 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W7000
AMD(1002 0420) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 42.3
21% 35.3 fps
MRender 31.1
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 26.1
23% 28.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 196 206 205 201 205 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 433
Write 383
Mixed 309
SusWrite 210
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 10.6
58% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 18
38% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9KSF25672AZ-1G4D1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 50 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2236 2236
Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback