Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime4 Days
Run DateDec 25 '17 at 11:17
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 188
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 330
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
MSI(1462 2833) 2GB
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 51.7
35% 44.3 fps
MRender 50
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 35.9
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.1.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 374
Write 169
Mixed 191
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 20.4
120% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 75.3
66% 93 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST3400633AS 400GB-$155
238GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 39
Write 41.2
Mixed 40
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.27
63% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$40
134GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 96.6
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.32
103% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate USB 320GB
281GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 43
Write 40.9
Mixed 21.8
43% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.32
52% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback