HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B5E
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 16:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 352
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
AMD(1002 1002) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 3
3% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 477
Write 414
Mixed 410
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 30.1
99% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 291
220% 297 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
879GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 172 170 173 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 162
Mixed 108
SusWrite 170
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6MFR8N-TF HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 25.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 31 60 23" 1280 720 DEL4098 DELL P2314H
Typical 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy) Builds (Compare 681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP 280 G2 MT (Non-Legacy)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback