HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B1D
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 16:25
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 68.4
1-Core 168
2-Core 345
100% 194 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1045
100% 824 Pts
64-Core 1572
97% 1572 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
HP(103C 8C36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 532.03
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 202
Parallax 218
174% 211 fps
MRender 313
Gravity 173
Splatting 129
159% 205 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 155%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1006 1TB
863GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1289 1388 1882 2110 2117 2094 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 1,907
Mixed 1,681
SusWrite 1,813
422% 1,875 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 49.1
182% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 796
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 732
498% 621 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 275%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP52U40S6HM-8FAE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
114% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 43.2
125% 43.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 24.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 114%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 2560 1369 SAM707A LC27G5xT
Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback