Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211014
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '23 at 15:40
Run Duration	293 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 75.9 1-Core 144 2-Core 286 90% 169 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 824 85% 685 Pts	64-Core 1,015 63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6700 3,011 User benchmarks, average bench 108% Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB Ram: 10GB, Driver: 23.2.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 134 Parallax 230 0% 121 fps	MRender 226 Gravity 121 Splatting 193 148% 180 fps
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB-$105 6,748 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 665GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 253 219 279 238 243 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 483 Write 435 Mixed 300 SusWrite 256 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 33.2 124% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 191 142% 190 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 108%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB 16,715 User benchmarks, average bench 280% 396GB free Firmware: SBM02103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1821 1213 215 214 920 1191 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 2144 Write 1,852 Mixed 1,539 SusWrite 929 362% 1,616 MB/s	4K Read 51.1 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 33.7 143% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,150 DQ Write 83.7 DQ Mixed 167 235% 467 MB/s
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 394%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$48 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 101 102 98 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 104 Write 100 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 101 68% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 113%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$48 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 28GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 159 162 157 152 160 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 148 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 156 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 113%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 510GB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 99 99 96 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 362GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 39 39 37 44 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 84.3 Write 130 Mixed 65.4 SusWrite 37.7 108% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 0.9 374% 3.9 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 1 427% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 92%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 885GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 95 95 95 91 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 96.9 Write 57.5 Mixed 54.1 SusWrite 91.9 98% 75.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G26C16U4R.16FE 2x16GB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 33 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.1 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 32.5 72% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 87.2 46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	219	60	60	27"	2560 1417	BNQ7F74 BenQ SW270C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,155x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $179Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,726x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,263x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $700Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	921x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	888x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	704x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $100Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	601x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	434x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	399x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	305x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	302x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	278x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $1,265

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16