Medionpc MS-7728

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedionpc MS-7728  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7728
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110815
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 10:37
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 92
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 140
66% 105 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 374
39% 311 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Elitegroup(1019 0013) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3
Parallax 2
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 196
Write 148
Mixed 162
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 28.8
98% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 122
102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
106GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 72 68 64 70 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 52.1
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 67.7
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38%
Great: 64%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
72GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 64 68 68 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 70.1
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 66.8
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 33 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM098E T24B301
Typical MS-7728 Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Medionpc MS-7728

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback