Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$180 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 164 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 390 37% 307 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Elitegroup(1019 0013) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3 Parallax 2 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 603ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 160 Write 156 Mixed 149 35% 155 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 29.3 84% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 156 116% 155 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,229 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 146GB free Firmware: JC4OA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 79 84 83 79 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 59.4 Write 65.4 Mixed 35.4 SusWrite 79.5 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 74% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 64%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 76GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 68 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 74.4 Write 55.8 Mixed 63.4 SusWrite 66.7 48% 65.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GB 792 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.9% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 14.8 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

RAM
M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 8GBNanyaBench 49%, 792 samples	58x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 45%, 800 samples	52x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 768 samples	27x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $267