Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '23 at 03:07
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 74.7 1-Core 71.4 2-Core 122 55% 89.2 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 154 22% 163 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 2.7 3% 3.37 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 8.2 4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 361 388 207 222 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 440 Write 401 Mixed 378 SusWrite 289 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 58 4K Mixed 1 78% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 21 36% 73.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 92%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 202GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 39.3 Write 40.1 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 40.9 53% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 029E CMK4GX4M1A2400C16 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	49% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 88.8 45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	29	14	60	18.5"	1280 720	SAM08A5 S19B300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	732x
Core i3-7100Intel $38Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	483x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	307x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	457x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	398x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	255x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	269x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	132x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	122x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	131x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16