Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 23:23
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 2600 How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 651
63% 520 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.5% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 108
Parallax 124
98% 117 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 112
Splatting 103
103% 130 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$55
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 150 135 146 69 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 446
Write 373
Mixed 314
SusWrite 138
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 12.2
62% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 10.6
DQ Write 98.6
DQ Mixed 8.1
20% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 55%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
847GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 174 157 162 163 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 153
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 163
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH55AA#ABM 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 23.5" 1920 1080 VSC0437 VX2458-mhd
Typical GA-AB350M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback