Alienware 13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAlienware 13  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0VMGD7
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 20:34
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 104
51% 80.7 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 160
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 0683) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.6
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 56 57 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 276
Write 61.2
Mixed 100
SusWrite 59.8
27% 124 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 36.7
4K Mixed 18.2
73% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 52.8
51% 82.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron CT102464BF160B.M16 1315 CT102464BF160B.M16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 15.2
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 13.2" 1280 720 AUO212C
Typical 13 Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback