QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10.8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory6.9 GB free of 10.8438 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 15:27
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 171
2-Core 339
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,263
116% 971 Pts
64-Core 1,556
96% 1,556 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 64
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 88.9
52% 70.9 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 44.8
48% 60.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 107GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,111
Write 4,617
Mixed 5,511
1,274% 5,746 MB/s
4K Read 117
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 114
383% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,419
DQ Write 1360
DQ Mixed 1388
1,043% 1,389 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 77%
Red Hat VirtIO 256GB
83GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 238 114 103 61 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 415
Write 112
Mixed 228
SusWrite 121
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 30.7
30% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x10GB
1 of 1 slots used
10GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 32.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.6
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.7
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 55" 1280 720 SNY7905 SONY TV *30
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback