Acer Veriton M200-H610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-H610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H610H7-M2
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230407
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateSep 24 '23 at 14:22
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 310
101% 187 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 989
95% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Elitegroup(1019 B852) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 8.6
6% 9.9 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.95%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin AS211 CSE25V51F70-512G 512GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11498
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 411 439 352 240 235 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 478
Mixed 445
SusWrite 356
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 47.1
180% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 304
220% 283 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown B44AU8G53222B-TJ16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.8" 1920 1017 ACR0758 EK240Y C
Typical Veriton M200-H610 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-H610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback