Rackable CYPRESS11

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRackable CYPRESS11  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S2600CP
Memory106.4 GB free of 112 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150511
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 23 '23 at 13:55
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 165
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 626
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 1,545
96% 1,545 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 1733) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 7.9
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 6.7
5% 6.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 231
Write 227
Mixed 216
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 17.7
69% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 98.7
99% 158 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.R
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 364
Write 320
Mixed 278
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 26.3
89% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 134
132% 211 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 97%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
223GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 424
Mixed 388
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 30.9
102% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 251
210% 302 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
223GB free
Firmware: MU02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 426
Mixed 386
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 30.7
103% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 251
210% 303 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
197GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 355
Write 359
Mixed 58.1
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 13.3
74% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 120
123% 200 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,298
Write 1,107
Mixed 1,108
261% 1,171 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 49
156% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 535
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 484
346% 448 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 186
Write 158
Mixed 79.7
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 156
Write 161
Mixed 83
165% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 98%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
31GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.7
Write 5
Mixed 5
8% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 14x8GB
14 of 16 slots used
112GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
121% Outstanding
MC Read 56.5
MC Write 48.2
MC Mixed 49.6
147% 51.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.5
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.3" 1280 720 BDSAB00 MDRC-2221
Typical CYPRESS11 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Rackable CYPRESS11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback