Asus PRIME H510M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H510M-E  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '23 at 19:05
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 248
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 634
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 7.3
5% 6 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWR256G-201II 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 128 132 63 85 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 448
Write 339
Mixed 196
SusWrite 103
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 12.7
33% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45.1
DQ Write 54.2
DQ Mixed 116
69% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
BRC MD401GNSE-CB4M2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 54 60 20" 1280 720 GSM4EE1 20EN33
Typical PRIME H510M-E Builds (Compare 6,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H510M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback