ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 3246A9U

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 3246A9U (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO
Memory	9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '17 at 20:13
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 152 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 281 38% 281 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 34.3 21% 28 fps	MRender 33.4 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 25.7 24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 126 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 83 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 49 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1653560123	44.9% Average	Read 268 Write 213 Mixed 218 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 39.7 4K Mixed 14.7 65% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 46.1 DQ Mixed 14.1 17% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 106GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7066 (0C) Power cycle count 76 76 24223 (B1) Unknown 86 86 167 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 50 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22087 (F1) Unknown 99 99 31464459525	42.2% Average	Read 261 Write 172 Mixed 183 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 13.6 61% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25.5 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 52 44% 61.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 3TB 573 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: D702 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Read 29.7 Write 26.1 Mixed 27.5 21% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.22 81% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 136GB free Firmware: 04.03B04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 16 (03) Spinup time 158 156 5075 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4932 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 30914 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3297 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 217 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4924 (C2) HDA temperature 118 100 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 114 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	40.5% Average	Read 66.9 Write 74 Mixed 67.3 52% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.27 74% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 CT25664BA1339.M8FD CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 CT25664BA1339.M8FD 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 14.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11.7 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback