Fujitsu Celsius W420

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

7 months ago, 6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Fujitsu Celsius W420 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3162-C1
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20141201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '23 at 23:04
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 98.7 2-Core 193 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 469 51% 405 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.6% Average	Lighting 55.3 Reflection 57 Parallax 48.9 45% 53.7 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 50.2 Splatting 45.9 38% 46.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 344 340 335 339 345 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 436 Mixed 409 SusWrite 343 93% 415 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 39.5 130% 43.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 345 264% 358 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 128%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 994GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 441 438 440 462 463 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 442 Mixed 398 SusWrite 447 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 61.2 4K Mixed 37.4 123% 42.2 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 360 271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 128%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 120GB 4,046 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 112GB free Firmware: 1.37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 54 59 51 53 51 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 185 Write 98.4 Mixed 141 SusWrite 55.4 27% 120 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 45.2 4K Mixed 24.3 85% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 91.9 79% 116 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.2% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 15.6 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 11.4 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	28.9"	1280 720	PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Celsius W420 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu Celsius W420

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	93x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	79x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	24x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	6x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	5x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,893 samples	10x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 13,591 samples	7x
M378B5273CH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 58%, 1,445 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16