Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 707
68% 559 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 68.5
58% 71.6 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 68.2
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 57 57 108 113 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 1,098
Write 129
Mixed 216
SusWrite 87.2
82% 382 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 44.2
148% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 142
166% 305 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 113%
Great: 295%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
76GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 160 146 158 157 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 297
Write 248
Mixed 239
SusWrite 152
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 36.4
125% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 184
154% 220 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
415GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 407 405 413 405 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 378
Write 218
Mixed 304
SusWrite 405
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 30.7
114% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 166
157% 240 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST4000NE0025-2EW107 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 164 161 158 160 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 148
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 160
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1
238% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D26BFSC.16FBD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
78.1% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 25
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback