MSI CSM-B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI CSM-B85M-E45 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 17:28
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 224
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 586
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gainward(10B0 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 136
Parallax 130
105% 132 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 136
Splatting 115
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 266 76 23 153 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 466
Write 322
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 127
55% 251 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 13.5
81% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 43.2
88% 173 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 102%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
98GB free
Firmware: B1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 181 232 273 197 321 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 68.9
Write 87.7
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 251
28% 121 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 8.1
34% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 8.2
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 12.3
9% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 29%
Great: 102%
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB
35GB free
Firmware: 8D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 437
Write 135
Mixed 160
SusWrite 131
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 22.3
102% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 65.3
96% 187 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 15.1
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 203 28 60 34" 1280 720 SAM0F70 S34J55x
Typical CSM-B85M-E45 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI CSM-B85M-E45 (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback