Colorful C.A68M-E PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardColorful C.A68M-E PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181227
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateSep 21 '23 at 02:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
45.7% Average
Memory 63
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 110
47% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 171
22% 168 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
XFX(1682 E580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 58.6
Parallax 76.4
0% 45.1 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 44.3
44% 55 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 124 91 11 52 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 352
Write 244
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 75.5
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 12
59% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 21.8
37% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
250GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63% Good
Read 108
Write 98
Mixed 62
SusWrite 112
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GMT8G04UCL116P-PBC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.2
24% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 180 10 60 20" 1600 900 HWP3056 HP P201
Typical C.A68M-E PRO Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Colorful C.A68M-E PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $27Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback