Asus X705UA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 8 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Asus X705UA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X705UA
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210817
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '23 at 23:53
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6006U 47,111 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	48.1% Average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 49.8 2-Core 93.1 47% 72.6 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 132 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 1A30) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.42% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 0.2 4% 2.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.42% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB 3,311 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6106002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 208 204 178 210 204 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 417 Write 363 Mixed 219 SusWrite 202 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 31.9 4K Mixed 22.5 76% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 187 157% 228 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 92%
Emtec X150 120GB 886 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 111GB free Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 212 21 20 58 57 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 284 Write 178 Mixed 197 SusWrite 102 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 11.1 45% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 95.7 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 19.9 23% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2400, 2667 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 12.6 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	62	46	60	17.3"	1280 720	BOE0685

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X705UA Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UA

CPU
Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples	34x
Core i3-7100UIntelBench 43%, 37,239 samples	16x
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	6x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	34x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	29x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	12x
SD9SN8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 69%, 3,311 samples	6x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 57%, 4,156 samples	6x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	13x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	11x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GBHynixBench 46%, 20,752 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16