Asus X705UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X705UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705UA
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210817
Uptime15.7 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 13:43
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 59
2-Core 95.8
47% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 163
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Asus(1043 1A30) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 5.9
0% 3.13 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 8
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 202 206 206 207 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 422
Write 348
Mixed 247
SusWrite 208
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 10.2
48% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 253
211% 306 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 92%
Emtec X150 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 143 34 46 58 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.2% Average
Read 283
Write 252
Mixed 219
SusWrite 99.4
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 11.2
66% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 159
136% 196 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X705UA Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X705UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback