Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4510U 63,054 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 69.2 2-Core 126 55% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 168 8-Core 179 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 178 11% 178 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.8% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 4.7 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 5.6 Gravity 2 Splatting 3.6 3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.8% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 7.1 32 129 136 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 330 Write 212 Mixed 152 SusWrite 119 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 12.2 52% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 90.8 DQ Mixed 19.2 38% 76.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston CMDMEMD3LS8G1600V1 2x8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.1% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 16.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	6	96	56	60	17.2"	1280 720	CMN1734

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	15x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	14x
GeForce GT 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 958 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	3x
Ultra II 240GBSanDisk $44Bench 82%, 53,931 samples	2x
PLUS 240 GB 240GBSandiskBench 43%, 24,911 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	8x
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 47%, 5,452 samples	5x
RMT3170ME68F9F1600 12GBKingstonBench 33%, 2 samples	1x