MSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C67
MotherboardMSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 20 '23 at 07:15
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 829
76% 638 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 291
Reflection 261
Parallax 300
237% 284 fps
MRender 331
Gravity 241
Splatting 177
196% 250 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 199%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 180 108 57 88 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 352
Write 342
Mixed 272
SusWrite 119
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 31.1
112% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 243
209% 310 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 101%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
120GB free
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 329 143 140 138 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 392
Write 333
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 182
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 0.9
45% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 15.9
36% 75.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 100%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
433GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 1379 1837 2005 1979 2041 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,612
Write 1,499
Mixed 1,363
SusWrite 1,668
346% 1,535 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 56.5
174% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 778
578% 768 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 255%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M1D3000C16 029E CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 24.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 23.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 32" 2560 1440 GDH0030 Smart TV
Typical MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67) Builds (Compare 3,226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MAG B365M MORTAR(MS-7C67)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback