Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 22:48
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 5800X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 175
2-Core 346
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,324
119% 1,002 Pts
64-Core 2,157
134% 2,157 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 110%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Gigabyte(1458 4006) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 113
Parallax 127
100% 121 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 112
Splatting 104
104% 131 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
871GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 454
Mixed 414
102% 456 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 43.2
154% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Corsair MP600 PRO NH 2TB
448GB free
Firmware: EIFM51.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,695
Write 4,344
Mixed 3,384
784% 3,474 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 108
342% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,562
DQ Write 1,299
DQ Mixed 1,453
1,082% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 262% Great: 576%
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20
Write 1.2
Mixed 6.7
9% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
19GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 143
Write 25.9
Mixed 37.5
66% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.9
141% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
135% Outstanding
MC Read 68.5
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 43.2
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 32.2
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 37.1
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 135%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 28% 54 218 60 144 24.5" 1280 720 AUS25A9 VG259QM
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 129%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback