User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 18:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 135
57% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 582
51% 434 Pts
64-Core 1,594
99% 1,594 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
XFX(1EAE 661A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 130
Parallax 228
95% 158 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 120
Splatting 191
146% 178 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000GB 1TB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 869 1223 1313 734 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 969
Write 524
Mixed 344
SusWrite 742
144% 645 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 16.9
81% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 374
243% 290 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 119%
Great: 228%
WD Elements SE 2623 2TB
2TB free, PID 2623
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 112 115 115 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 122
Write 106
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 113
136% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.6
281% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 26.9
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 14.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 23 165 23.8" 1280 720 GBT2402 GIGABYTE G24F
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback