User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 153
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 610
57% 477 Pts
64-Core 1,415
88% 1,415 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
XFX(1EAE 661A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 23.8.2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 130
Parallax 225
92% 156 fps
MRender 218
Gravity 115
Splatting 184
141% 172 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000GB 1TB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 985 576 14 560 19 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,072
Write 1,080
Mixed 829
SusWrite 376
188% 839 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 18.2
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 388
278% 360 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 110%
Great: 228%
WD Elements SE 2623 2TB
2TB free, PID 2623
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 114 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 118
Write 104
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 113
132% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.7
298% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 26.5
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 17.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 23.8" 1280 720 GBT2402 GIGABYTE G24F
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback