MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '23 at 11:38
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 661
72% 570 Pts
64-Core 671
42% 671 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$246
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 117
Parallax 135
106% 127 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 100
Splatting 87.9
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM4PS7256G 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5552
Write 27.4
Mixed 55.1
390% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 619
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
940% 207 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 96%
V-GEN10SM21SCY512IN 512GB
118GB free
Firmware: T1125A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 437
Write 409
Mixed 372
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 20
120% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 31.6
78% 156 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
158GB free
Firmware: SC23
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.5
Write 98
Mixed 53.9
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.5
Write 19.7
Mixed 16.2
25% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.5
110% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 24.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 23.8" 1280 720 AIO0981 AIRO24X202103
Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback