MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190408
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 06:23
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 240
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 641
70% 555 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 118
Parallax 124
107% 124 fps
MRender 141
Gravity 101
Splatting 88.3
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM4PS7256G 256GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 39 40 40 45 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 96%
V-GEN10SM21SCY512IN 512GB
147GB free
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 260 151 89 88 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 417
Write 379
Mixed 354
SusWrite 168
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 20.4
116% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 33
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
276GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 138 140 143 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 166
Write 164
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 140
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 24
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback