Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 21:01
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 140
2-Core 260
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 829
84% 681 Pts
64-Core 1,060
66% 1,060 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.1% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 124
Parallax 176
89% 136 fps
MRender 94.6
Gravity 117
Splatting 80.2
78% 97.2 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 371 377 381 303 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 438
Mixed 378
SusWrite 361
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 48.4
164% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 161
138% 203 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 103%
Great: 111%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
186GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 261 83 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 455
Mixed 432
SusWrite 160
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 51.9
173% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 79% Great: 136%
Mushkin Pilot NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$144
141GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 940 1630 1728 1716 1710 707 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,332
Write 1,716
Mixed 1,136
SusWrite 1,405
368% 1,647 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 89.1
302% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,112
DQ Write 1,022
DQ Mixed 1,120
826% 1,085 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 320%
Great: 340%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
211GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1434 544 577 567 578 571 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,027
Write 2,267
Mixed 1,941
SusWrite 712
390% 1,737 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 79.4
272% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,287
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 1,086
818% 1,102 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 258%
Great: 300%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
466GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 376 380 383 382 378 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 450
Mixed 436
SusWrite 378
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 58.4
192% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 220
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 113%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Mushkin MLX4C320GJJM8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 37.5
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 36.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 120 24.5" 1280 720 IVM616C PL2561H
Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $838
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback