Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive342% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 16:15
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 177
2-Core 352
107% 203 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,058
106% 862 Pts
64-Core 1,560
96% 1,560 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$479
PNY(196E 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 242
Reflection 219
Parallax 213
198% 225 fps
MRender 257
Gravity 164
Splatting 132
145% 184 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Verbatim Vi3000 1TB
892GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2225 2242 2242 2243 2244 2236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 1,346
Write 2,227
Mixed 1,662
SusWrite 2,238
425% 1,868 MB/s
4K Read 62.4
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 92
320% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,286
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,214
904% 1,199 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 342%
Great: 342%
Verbatim Vi3000 1TB
874GB free
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2078 2275 2274 2283 2275 2283 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
348% Outstanding
Read 1,354
Write 2,257
Mixed 1,684
SusWrite 2,244
429% 1,885 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 92.2
320% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1,357
DQ Write 1,248
DQ Mixed 1,286
969% 1,297 MB/s
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
23GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 4.6 42 39 18 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 457
Write 229
Mixed 164
SusWrite 59.3
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 19.6
79% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 29.6
42% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
510GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 165 164 166 168 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 162
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 166
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C18 Series 3200 C18 Series 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 33.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical GA-B550 GAMING X V2 Builds (Compare 4,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 GAMING X V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback