Dell Precision 7820 Tower

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDell Precision 7820 Tower  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0804P1
Memory51.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 07:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5217
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 52.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
67% 126 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 780
71% 597 Pts
64-Core 2,226
138% 2,226 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000 24GB
HP(103C 1157) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 94.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 102
77% 101 fps
MRender 86.5
Gravity 89.9
Splatting 79.1
69% 85.2 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
506GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 431 430 435 429 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 449
Write 416
Mixed 312
SusWrite 429
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 34.9
133% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 286
233% 332 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
150GB free
Firmware: KC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 129 130 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 130
Mixed 66
SusWrite 130
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GB
4 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 7.5
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 9 60 31.5" 2560 1369 AOC3204 Q32V4WG5
Typical Precision 7820 Tower Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Dell Precision 7820 Tower

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback