bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
System
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 01:49
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 165
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 215
30% 219 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700XT 50th Anniversary
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 140
Parallax 229
106% 167 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 141
Splatting 93.7
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 166 115 53 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 391
Write 324
Mixed 314
SusWrite 116
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 20.6
92% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 24.6
31% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Portable 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 113 110 114 113 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 83.8
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 112
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BCF0-DJ-F 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.1
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 32 0 31.5" 1280 720 HEC0030 HISENSE
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback