MSI B650M PROJECT ZERO (MS-7E09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive273% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E09
MotherboardMSI B650M PROJECT ZERO (MS-7E09)  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateSep 18 '23 at 00:23
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
AM5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 135
2-Core 203
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 315
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.34
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (170 fps cap detected)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 170
Parallax 170
138% 170 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 170
Splatting 170
139% 170 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 131%
Great: 205%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP4002T 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42BFU6MB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 934 806 816 1074 1043 1107 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,185
Write 2,016
Mixed 1,633
SusWrite 963
381% 1,699 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 77.3
262% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,189
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 781
649% 941 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 273%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF556C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
180% Outstanding
MC Read 86.4
MC Write 56.1
MC Mixed 61.7
194% 68.1 GB/s
SC Read 50
SC Write 46.8
SC Mixed 49.4
139% 48.7 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 138%
This bench: 180%
Great: 193%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 46 144 27" 2560 1440 ACR080E ED270U P
Typical B650M PROJECT ZERO (MS-7E09) Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 244%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B650M PROJECT ZERO (MS-7E09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $1,080
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback