Toshiba Satellite C55-B

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-B (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ZSWAA
Memory	2.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140719
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '23 at 22:46
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4005U 37,483 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 81 1-Core 33.2 2-Core 58.4 41% 57.5 Pts	4-Core 77.3 8-Core 82 11% 79.7 Pts	64-Core 81.1 5% 81.1 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) 275,372 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F910) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1.1 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.8 1% 0.73 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-force 256GB 256GB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: U1014A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 392 394 368 373 380 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 457 Write 404 Mixed 395 SusWrite 382 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 14.9 74% 25.3 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 31.3 62% 124 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston TSB16D3LFS1KBG/2G 6GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.7% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 10.5 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	SDC4347

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-B Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-B

CPU
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	98x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	96x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	53x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	198x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	155x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	20x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	99x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	47x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369