HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 17 '23 at 17:17
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 512
53% 428 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Lighting 30.4
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 31.1
25% 30.7 fps
MRender 33.8
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 20.1
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC2000M82000G 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: S2780101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 553 1312 1395 1420 1421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,912
Write 1,442
Mixed 125
SusWrite 1,096
254% 1,144 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 63.2
208% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 614
489% 692 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 241%
Great: 368%
Kingston SKC6002048G 2TB
497GB free
Firmware: S4500109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 399 403 418 426 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 368
Mixed 348
SusWrite 412
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 39.5
127% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 269
221% 317 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 132%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB
233GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 89 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 90.1
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 89.5
54% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-044.A00G Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 27" 1280 720 SAM0E41 C27FG7x
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback